This article by Michael Booth challenges the utopian image of the Nordic region, including its approach to cultural and historical narratives. While not directly about monuments, it critiques the idealized perception of Nordic societies as models of democracy and equality, pointing out flaws like Sweden’s historical lack of democratic transparency and Finland’s high rates of violence and suicide. Booth argues that the Nordic countries’ cultural narratives often gloss over uncomfortable truths, which ties into how they might handle controversial monuments—potentially by avoiding confrontation with difficult histories rather than addressing them head-on. For example, the article mentions Denmark’s high happiness scores but questions the underlying social cohesion, which could influence how monuments symbolizing past oppression are perceived or debated.
More, here
